Positional Eligibility Matters
January 16th, 2013 | by Ray Flowers |
The Tigers announced, through GM Dave Dombrowski, that Victor Martinez will not catch in 2013 as the Tigers plan to let Alex Avila and Brayan Pena handle the tools of ignorance. This decision has a whole bunch of fantasy implications that need to be investigated an understood, so I will use V-Mart as my primary discussion point on positional eligibility before listing a whole series of other players who may or may not be worth an extra bit of emphasis on draft day because of the positions on the field that they are, or aren’t, qualified for in the fantasy game.
(1) If V-Mart doesn’t catch in 2013 and only suits up at DH what does that do to his positional eligibility in your fantasy league? Usually we just look back to the previous season and see if the guy played 20 games at a position. If he did, then we just lock him into eligibility for that position. However, Victor didn’t play a single game last year after he injured his knee (he tore his ACL and had surgery. Current reports suggest that he should be good to go for Opening Day). Does that mean he will only be DH eligible in 2013, or does your league do what I think is the correct thing to do which is to look back at the last season the player actually appeared in the big leagues? If we take that tact and look back at 2011 we find that Martinez did appear in 26 games as a catcher and therefore should be catcher eligible in 2013. This is a vital question to answer – where does Martinez qualify in 2013? As a catching option Martinez is a potentially elite play. As a DH only player he’s merely a solid option. Huge difference in value as a result of where he qualifies.
(2) If he really isn’t going to catch, what happens in interleague play when the Tigers face an NL club? Obviously he isn’t going to play first base with Prince Fielder there. Does that mean when the Tigers are forced to play an “NL game” that Victor will merely be limited to pinch hitting duties? Does that negate the potential benefits he should derive from being a full-time DH since he won’t be able to start for stretches of time? Also, how will he respond to being out of the starting lineup for days at a time when the Tigers face those NL clubs? A few points to consider when it comes to evaluating the expected levels of production that one should expect from Martinez in 2013. Obviously, there’s a lot to think about with a guy like V-Mart beyond what should one be expecting from his bat (I would assume that he will return as a very impressive hitter, though what exactly that means is a tad uncertain. I’d be looking at his 2010 effort as my baseline, and in that season he hit .302 with 20 homers and 79 RBIs. Don’t forget that the 34 year old sat out an entire season last year, and that is significant even if many will try to minimize its importance).
Here are some other key players to think about in terms of how their positional eligibility effects their value. Remember, the standard for most leagues is 20 games played at a position the previous year.
Mike Aviles is only shortstop eligible after appearing in two games at second and one at third.
Jose Bautista will only qualify as an outfielder in 2013 after appearing in only one game at third and four at first in 2012.
Brandon Belt appeared in only four games in the outfield losing eligibility there.
Emilio Bonifacio plays all over the place and he should do the same thing for the Blue Jays in 2013. Here are his games played totals from last season: outfield (51 games), second base (15 games). So much for his second, third and shortstop eligibility from ’11.
Billy Butler appeared in only 11 games at first base in 2011 causing him to be DH only eligible in 2012. He rectified that situation by appearing in 20 games at first in 2012.
Chris Davis lost third base from his ledger (zero games), but he is still eligible at first and the outfield.
Edwin Encarnacion is only first base eligible in 2013. He suited up just one time at third base last season.
Adrian Gonzalez fell just short of qualifying in the outfield with 18 games in right field.
Mike Morse appeared in only one game at first base.
Trevor Plouffe has a nice power bat but he qualifies only at third base (95 games) heading into the season. He should be a starter in the outfield for the Twins in 2013, but he appeared in only 17 games in the outfield, four at second and one at short last season.
Martin Prado appeared in 119 games in the outfield, 25 at third, 13 at shortstop, 10 at second and four at first base.
Hanley Ramirez appeared 98 times at third and 57 times at shortstop. Don’t forget that also means that he is eligible to fill the middle and corner infield spots.
Mark Reynolds appeared in 108 games at first but only 15 at third base.
Kyle Seager qualifies at third base (138 games) but not at second (18 games, 14 starts).
Mark Trumbo may or may not qualify as a first baseman for you. He appeared in 21 games at first base last season but only 16 as a starter. Does your league use starts or appearances as the benchmark? Make sure you check it out.
Michael Young appeared in 41 games at first and 25 games at third base. He was only a second sacker 16 times.
Ben Zobrist is a money play in 2013. Not only does he produced impressive numbers at the dish, but he also qualifies at second (58 games), outfield (71 games) and, here’s the kicker, shortstop (47 games). That ability to fill three roster spots is golden and certainly bumps up his value substantially, especially in deeper leagues.
By Ray Flowers
Tags: Adrian Gonzalez, Ben Zobrist, Billy Butler, Brandon Belt, Chris Davis, Edwin Encarnacion, Emilio Bomifacio, Hanley Ramirez, Jose Bautista, Kyle Seager, Mark Trumbo, Martin Prado, Michael Young, Mike Morse, Positional Eligibility, Trevor Plouffe, Victor Martinez

















By Tim on Jan 16, 2013
Great Points fortunately in our league, V-Mart is a catcher and Ive got him for $3 in a 130 Cap 2 catcher roto (14 Teams 23 active spots).
It was actually a little touch and go last year because there was this lingering question about whether or not he was gonna try and come back and if he played you knew darn well he wasnt going to catch and therefore not be eligible, but if he didnt play it would revert to 2012 opening day elig based on where he played in 2011.
My league has an interesting rule, guys who combine for 20+ games at SS-2B or 1B-3B are eligible at the CI and MI positions, both Prado and Young qualify for MI which gives them a little more value.
One thing Ive been reading a lot and just blows my mind is why serious leagues are driven by what their stat provider declares as eligiblity of a players position. Lots of chatter about “how I hope this site or that site says he is C eligible”. Why not have a set of rules or By-Laws that make sense as opposed to being driven by what site XYZ says.
By Ray Flowers on Jan 16, 2013
Tim – I think we should just use 20 games played as the baseball since it’s basically always been the way we have done it. If your ‘provider’ does something you don’t agree with in terms of positional eligibility, then switch providers to someone that will allow that, right?
By Tim on Jan 16, 2013
Yep 20 works well and if a guy doesnt play because he went to Japan or was injured or comes out of retirement or suspended, you go back to last season played.
By Scott on Jan 17, 2013
Ray, how do “The Wrench” Allen Craig’s games played breakdown? Is he looking at 1B/OF eligibility in most leagues?
By Ray Flowers on Jan 17, 2013
Scott – 31 in the OF and 91 at first base for Allen Craig. He should be good to go.
By Cosmo on Jan 18, 2013
Note to Tim:
In response to your statement about why we worry about what our stat providers, I would say we need to because no matter what you are your “by-laws” state, if your provider doesn’t list your player at a certain position, then you’re not going to be able to plug him in that spot, by-laws or not.
By Tim on Jan 19, 2013
I realize that and I just dont get why serioius leagues wouldnt have by-laws and a stat provider than can meet those needs. Why not go with a stat service like onroto.com (sorry to Ray if were not supposed to mention sites), its less than $100 for the season for the entire league and you can create whatever settings you like to fit your by-laws?
I hear the same thing with regards to free agents: “I couldnt pick up this rookie because he wasnt in the database yet” when everyone knows he is gonna be called up?
In normal size leagues that is less than $10 per team, works out to like $1.50 per month of the baseball season, people can find that in their sofas.
By Ray Flowers on Jan 19, 2013
Tim – Can’t disagree with any of your sentiments. You make a very strong case.
By Tim on Jan 19, 2013
Some of the guys in my our main money league which has been around over 20 years and I have talked about this when we play in other leagues is that if the league is made of mostly guys who got into fantasy sports (especially football first) after all the sites are on the internet, they seem to take that model of just going with whatever the site says, because in football which is where most of them started doing fantasy, that probably works OK for your average league.
But if you were pre-internet with commissioners doing stats on excel with weekly stats on Sundays in the Mercury News you probably view things different. If you are pre-internet and maybe baseball first type of commissioner and league, you probably have bylaws. If you are post internet doing baseball after doing football, you are probably more familiar with the site being the rule setter.
By Ray Flowers on Jan 19, 2013
Tim – I’m so old school I used to use the USA Today on Sundays to put the stats together… and I didn’t even have spreadsheets, never mind the internet.
By Tim on Jan 19, 2013
Our league was San Jose Mercury News they published all the stats on Sunday the league started in 1992.
By Jeff on Feb 3, 2013
Ray-How do I best utilize the BOLD players throughout your rankings? Are they flier type players or value based picks? Great stuff by the way.
By Ray Flowers on Feb 3, 2013
Jeff – On the front page – C page – there is an explanation of Bold players. They are players that I like at the point of the draft that they will be available, meaning, they should outperform their cost on draft day.